A Guide to Pension Freedom
Contents:
- A Pension Revolution
- The Rules - Key Points
- The Freedom to draw your Pension from 55
- The Death Tax Rules
- Restrictions on Contributions
- Other complicating factors
- For those saving towards Retirement
- For those already in Retirement
- General Financial Planning Implications for Everyone
A Pensions Revolution
In March 2014 George Osborne announced a series of new rules relating to pensions. Collectively these rule changes are now widely referred to as ‘Pension Freedom’. They came into effect in April 2015.
The rules changed the way retirees might plan their retirements and will affect many generations, not just those at the point of retirement.
It was not as if pensions had been left untouched prior to 2015; for the previous decade just about every aspect of pensions – the tax treatment, allowances, restrictions, benefits, investment options and availability had been radically altered in one way or another.
In this respect retirement planning and the way pensions could be used was already subject to a changing environment. The April 2015 changes moved everything on again, providing a completely new set of considerations.
As with many areas where change has taken place, this presents a fresh challenge for those of you looking to manage your finances to ensure you have a successful and comfortable retirement.
Our guide aims to inform you of the main headlines that surround the rule changes and how they impact different situations and circumstances.
This is an overview, not a detailed analysis. We are especially keen to emphasise how the new rules will change the way you approach financial planning.
This is not a technical guide – some of these areas remain complex and detailed aspects may change depending on your circumstances.
The Rules – key points
- From age 55 anyone drawing upon a private pension will be able to draw on their fund, as they like, exercising flexible options which suit their circumstances;
- This only applies to money purchase pensions – more commonly known as “defined contribution schemes” such as private pensions;
- However, there are some knock-on effects for those of you who have “defined benefit schemes” such as a final salary pension (because you may be able to transfer to a defined contribution scheme and use the new ‘freedom’); • The tax rules on the death of a pension investor are also different, as of April 2015;
- There are also rules applying to contribution limits and the maximum amount that can be accumulated in total into a pension;
- There are many factors around all of this which will be dependent on individual circumstances (for example, your tax position and your overall savings and wealth position);
- There are a number of complicating factors that have arisen in practice which you need to be aware of (for example, some pension providers are restricting what can be taken and/or encashment charges are being imposed).
You will also note two major points; the changes apply to people taking (drawing down) their pensions from age 55 and they apply – in the main to private pensions.
This may suggest that it is only people with a private pension and close to or approaching retirement age who need to be concerned with the new rules. This is not the case, the impact of these new rules will knock on to younger people and also to those with defined benefit (final salary or occupational) pension schemes.
Everyone with a pension should be reviewing their plan of action.
THE IMPACT OF THESE NEW RULES WILL KNOCK ON TO YOUNGER PEOPLE AND THOSE WITH DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION SCHEMES
The freedom to draw your pension from age 55:
Pension investors aged over 55 can access their pensions with complete freedom.
Instead of being forced, under the old rules, to convert savings into annual income (an annuity), they can take out as much as they like, as often as required.
Historically, most pension investors with private pensions bought annuities. This turned a pension into a regular income that lasted for life.
A small number of wealthier savers were able to use an “income drawdown” plan, where the pension pot remained invested as an income was drawn.
All income drawdown restrictions on income were lifted as of April 2015. The options available to pension savers changed from April 2015. Post-April 2015 savers have three main choices:
• You can withdraw all of your pension money immediately.
• You can leave it invested and take income when required.
• Or you can buy an annuity.
It is worth pointing out that these options are not exclusive of each other. In other words you could combine or blend different options in an overall plan of action. Income withdrawals, however they are taken, will be liable for income tax.
Whichever of the three options is exercised the saver will still be entitled to a tax free lump sum, normally 25% of the total pot.
People who have already bought annuities are excluded from these new freedoms.
The April 2015 changes have led to a widespread reporting of the ‘death of annuities’; however this may be exaggerated. We explain why a little later in this report.
The ‘death tax’ rules:
Under the previous rules pension funds were subject to a 55% tax charge - unless the pension investor died before age 75 and had not taken any tax-free cash or income, in which case the pension was passed to beneficiaries as a tax-free lump sum.
This changed from April 2015. It is now feasible for an individual’s pension fund to potentially cascade down through generations of a family potentially free of all tax.
Death Benefits – The options
Death benefits are either subject to income tax at marginal rates on the beneficiary or tax free. The only differentiator for determining which will apply is the age at which the pension investor dies.
Where the death of the investor occurs prior to age 75, any benefits left to the beneficiary will be taxfree. However, where the investor dies at age 75 or any time after, the benefits will be subject to income tax at the beneficiary’s marginal rate of income tax.
Example A below illustrates the position.
Under the Pension Freedom rules, pensions can now be viewed in a different light.
As the opportunity arises for pensions to be left to future generations as a legacy.
Diagram B below illustrates this further. In most planning scenarios the pension fund should be viewed, first and foremost, as a retirement savings plan, with its main purpose as a means of providing retirement income. However the improved death benefit and legacy position, of any fund value that is still in place on death, may be highly influential in how plans are structured and in what way they are drawn. The legacy consideration has become a significant factor, since the rules were changed.
Restrictions on contributions
Some of you may already have ‘clocked’ a potential and very large loophole in these new rules. At the current time you can pay £40,000 per year into a pension and get tax relief at your highest marginal rate of tax.
From April 2015 you can take all the pension money out as you like, when you like.
For someone over 55 this would suggest they could pay in £40,000 – maximise their income tax relief on the contribution and then withdraw the £40,000 the following week getting 25% of this amount tax free!
This opportunity has been restricted by a change in the rules relating to how much you can contribute if you are withdrawing income under a drawdown plan. In this case if you are making withdrawals from a drawdown plan you will be restricted in the level of contributions you can make. These new proposed rules and the restrictions are complex – however put simply, you will not be able to make contributions freely if you are withdrawing monies from your pension.
HMRC have in place rules to stop or restrict this so-called ‘recycling’. You need to be very wary and careful therefore if you are continuing to make contributions (or want to) and are seeking to access your funds from your pension post your age 55.
There is a Money Purchase Annual Allowance (MPAA) now in place, which was £10,000 for tax years 2015/16 and 2016/2017 and for future tax years is set at £4,000.
As stated the rules around the recycling and the MPAA are convoluted, the above is merely a brief summary and a flag for you to be aware of.
It is essential you take advice on this point should you consider it may affect you or any decisions you have to make.
Other complicating factors
The pension rules and legislation relating to pensions remain complex.
We will not cover these complexities in any detail here, suffice to say that advice is required to understand them and relate them to particular circumstances.
To touch on just a few to highlight the point, these include issues relating to the flexibility to carry forward allowances from tax year to tax year, where the annual allowance has not been used. Another is the Pension Lifetime Allowance – which means the total value of your pensions cannot exceed £1,055,000 (in 2019/20) without triggering a tax charge on the excess.
Then, for many people, there are issues relating to ‘multi-pensions’ often with different rules applying to them. For example, where an individual has a pension they have contributed to themselves, possibly a personal pension and also a pension from previous employment, possibly a final salary scheme. How do these work alongside each other?
Pensions are inherently complex and the way to maximise them and to get the best returns and value are going to vary from personal situation to situation AND be linked into other financial plans within a particular set of circumstances.
The Financial Planning Implications
A combination of the new freedoms with the changes to the tax treatment on death have altered how pensions should be viewed for millions of people. The financial planning implications are many and varied. We can now consider some of the major ones below:
For those saving towards their retirement Pensions have clearly become much more attractive.
Many people previously found the inflexibility of pensions at the point of retirement a compelling reason to avoid pensions and to use alternative savings vehicles, such as ISAs.
The Pension vs. ISA debate has certainly shifted towards pensions, but this does not mean that pensions should be favoured over ISAs. It has always been a balanced question, largely determined by personal circumstances. However for many people who have used ISAs instead of pensions this will need to be reviewed.
The introduction of Auto-enrolment into the workplace will mean millions of workers have been offered employer-sponsored pensions over the past few years; many for the first time. These will include employer contributions and a combination of this and the new flexibility should encourage higher savings levels.
A proportion of savers also invest for the future using ‘buy to let’ property investments – a planning approach which has generally paid off over the past 10-20 years, as a combination of low interest rates, rising rents and house prices has produced a positive backdrop for this approach. Conversely pensions have been seen as inflexible and, in relation to annuity rates, poor value. The Pension Freedom change will shift this comparison. For those people who have worked on the “my property is my pension” basis there could be good reasons now to look at this afresh.
Anyone heading towards retirement – and that really means anyone in the workplace of any age – should review how much they are saving, their saving strategy and their overall long term financial plan.
The new rules will probably suggest in many cases a shift in direction.
For those already in retirement
For anyone who has already entered into an annuity, the position is clear, you are committed and the new rules do not affect you, you will continue to receive your annuity income as is. For those of you who have yet to draw a pension or are currently using a drawdown plan then you will be able to benefit from the new rules. You should review how and when you may be able to draw down your income, structure your overall plans (allowing for the new death tax rules) and reposition your plans accordingly.
The new rules applying to death taxes may well change your approach to Inheritance Tax Planning or how you structure taking your pension in your own lifetime; the balance between maximising your lifetime income requirement and the desire to hand money down to the next generations may well have changed as a result of the new rules.
For those coming up towards retirement/planning to retire soon
Under the new rules you have three options as described earlier: take an annuity; take your whole fund in one go or take monies as and when required.
Two aspects of these options which have not been well publicised are that you can (a) mix and match your options; for example, you can convert some of your pension to an annuity and take casual flexible withdrawals from the remainder. In this respect balancing your approach; and (b) you can take flexible withdrawals now but convert to an annuity later. In this case you may well like the idea of an annuity and the guarantee/certainty it provides, but wish to hold back, thinking that there may be better annuity rates (income levels) to be obtained in a few years.
FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHO HAVE WORKED ON THE MY PROPERTY IS MY PENSION BASIS THERE COULD BE GOOD REASONS NOW TO LOOK AT THIS AFRESH.
A Series of General Financial Planning Considerations for Everyone
1. These changes apply to private pensions.
One key factor is that, in the main, these changes apply to private pensions only. Pensions such as Personal Pensions, SIPPs, Stakeholder Schemes, Group Personal Pensions and most Additional Voluntary Contribution schemes. They do not apply to occupational schemes, such as company final salary schemes and the Public Sector pension scheme. There is small exception to this where occupational scheme members will be able to be benefit from the death tax change after age 75.
However the main changes are for those people who have private pensions. This, without question, moves the comparison between the two types of scheme in favour of private pensions. This does not mean those of you with company pensions should abandon them, because the guaranteed benefits of your type of scheme and their often generous terms will still make them a better option.
But there may well be circumstances where the new rules of the private pension scheme are better. The new landscape will make it more likely that a transfer could be beneficial and for certain it emphasises the need for those of you in this type of scheme to – at the very least – examine the transfer option as an option to manage your money in retirement. This may well end with you rejecting this option, but it should be explored prior to retirement.
Transfers will be available for those of you with company/final salary schemes, but transfers from most Public Sector schemes will not be permitted.
2. Annuities should not automatically be rejected.
Much comment has been passed as a result of the announcements around the changes, that annuities are ‘dead in the water’; with the improved flexibility of being able to take benefits as you like, why tie yourself into an annuity?
A fairly priced annuity may still present the best option; because annuities represent a guaranteed income for life with all the certainty this brings.
Survey after survey suggest the majority of people need certainty at retirement. The annuity is the only option likely to produce this. The other options are more risky and not many people want to take on risk in their retirement.
Annuities have been poor value for many years because of low interest rates; annuity income levels could well improve in the future. In addition there are new style annuity products being introduced which are providing more flexibility, especially in terms of keeping the door ajar to improved rates in the future, should general rates improve.
Finally, in circumstances of ill health, certain medical conditions or where some lifestyle factors apply, annuity income levels can be enhanced, which could be valuable for many retirees.
The UK government seems to be modelling its pension reforms around the way other countries manage their pensions, for example, Norway, Holland and Australia, which all have flexible arrangements for their retirees. However all of these countries also have a high proportion of retirement income paid through annuities.
Greater flexibility does not mean people should reject annuities.
3. Decisions will be largely based on personal circumstances and tax
The government should be applauded for opening up more choice; this can only (on the average) be a good thing. However people should approach matters with great care; the tax changes are predicted over the next ten years to be positive for the UK Treasury. Emphasising how the changes are mechanical ones. These predictions may turn out to be incorrect; especially if at an individual level retirees can plot their income to maximise the amounts they receive whilst minimising the amount of tax.
The need therefore for anyone planning their way forward is to combine their expenditure requirements with a carefully prepared appraisal of how they can draw on their pension to cover this expenditure in the most tax efficient way possible.
Other factors need to be brought into this planning (for example other savings, the need to cover care fees in the future, the desire to pay off debt, leaving money to beneficiaries and so on) and an overall financial map needs to be created which weighs up all considerations.
This will allow a personal plan of action to be formed which will be based on personal circumstances aimed at maximising your position around the new flexibility and tax position.
It is always a difficult matter to generalise about pensions and about “what to do”, because the position is so heavily affected by personal circumstances. The key element here is that the changes announced throughout 2014 and introduced in 2015 will alter the way millions of people deal with their pensions. Each and every person with a pension scheme will need to review their planning accordingly.
Receive the Full Guide and Subscribe to our Newsletter
You can unsubscribe at any time
Getting Help And Support
Readers should not rely on, or take any action or steps, based on anything written in this guide without first taking appropriate advice. Interface Financial Planning Ltd cannot be held responsible for any decisions based on the wording in this guide where such advice has not been sought or taken. The information contained in this guide is based on legislation as of the date of preparation and this may be subject to change.